OCTA biomarkers in adults aged 50 and above: a prospective and cross-sectional community-based study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the normative values and parameters of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) influencing the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in adults aged 50 and above. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study from an eye screening programme in Hong Kong for 4188 citizens aged 50 and above. Images were analysed using a validated quantification software calculating vessel density and capillary perfusion density (CPD), along with other OCTA parameters, such as the foveal avascular zone area (FAZ) and circularity. OCTA data was collected from May 2019 to December 2020, including a total of 4188 healthy eyes from 4188 subjects. RESULTS: Mean superficial vessel density (MSVD) was 14.48 ± 3.60 mm- 1, while the mean capillary perfusion density (MCPD) was 0.41 ± 0.06. Multivariate analysis revealed ageing (ß = 0.321, p < 0.001), being male (ß=-0.089, p < 0.001), having a high body mass index (BMI) (ß = 0.039, p = 0.006), high FAZ area and low FAZ circularity (ß = 0.039 and - 0.034, p = 0.01 and 0.024 respectively), low MSVD in the outer ring (ß=-0.513, p < 0.001), specifically in the nasal and temporal outer quadrants (ß = -0.226 and - 0.259, p < 0.001 for both), and low MCPD in the outer superior quadrant (ß= -0.123, p = 0.016) being independently associated with BCVA. CONCLUSION: High FAZ area and low FAZ circularity, low MSVD in the outer ring, specifically the nasal and temporal outer quadrants, and low MCPD in the outer superior quadrant can be used as biomarkers in predicting a low visual acuity in adults aged 50 and above.

Risk of Postcolonoscopy Thromboembolic Events: A Real-World Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND& AIMS: Although antithrombotic agents could increase the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding, interruption of these agents also increases the risk of thromboembolism (TE). We assessed the risks of postcolonoscopy TE events and their association with the interruption of antithrombotic agents. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy between January 2016 and March 2021. We determined the rates of postcolonoscopy TE events in patients taking various antithrombotic agents (with or without interruption), and in different patient groups according to indications for colonoscopy, underlying TE, and bleeding risks. RESULTS: Of the 6220 patients, 1755 (28.2%) were on antithrombotics. Overall, 20 patients (0.32%) developed TE events, and 25 (0.80%) of 3134 patients with polypectomy experienced major episodes of bleeding. Among all patients on antithrombotic agents, the highest rates of TE events were observed in patients on dual-antiplatelet therapy (4.65%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 28.0; 95% CI, 3.77-142.1) and clopidogrel (2.78%; aOR, 12.2; 95% CI, 2.10-57.0), compared with 0.11% among those not on antithrombotics. In patients interrupting anti-thrombotic agents, the risk of TE was increased compared to those on no agent as follows: stopping 2 or more antithrombotic agents (4.55%; aOR, 22.5; 95% CI, 1.09-158.0), monotherapy with clopidogrel (3.06%; aOR, 15.5; 95% CI, 2.86-69.6), warfarin (1.33%; aOR, 6.96; 95% CI, 1.14-33.5), or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (0.87%; aOR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.22-26.8). Having an underlying high TE risk (aOR, 16.8; 95% CI, 6.33-46.6) was associated with higher postcolonoscopy TE events. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of post-colonoscopy thromboembolic events is low. However, the temporary interruption of antithrombotic agents, particularly stopping 2 or more agents, clopidogrel, warfarin, or direct-acting oral anticoagulants was associated with higher postcolonoscopy TE events, particularly in high-risk patients.

A prospective study of the impact of glycaemic status on clinical outcomes and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses among patients with predominantly non-severe COVID-19.

AIMS: We carried out this prospective study of predominantly non-severe COVID-19 patients, to evaluate the influence of glycaemic status on clinical outcomes and neutralising antibody (Nab) responses, potentially relevant to the COVID-19 vaccination programme. METHODS: We included consecutive adults admitted to Queen Mary Hospital for COVID-19 from July 2020-May 2021. Glycaemic status was defined by admission HbA1c. Clinical deterioration was defined by radiological progression/new oxygen requirement/intensive care requirement/death. COVID-19 survivors had Nab measurements at 1-month, 2-month, 3-month and 6-month post-discharge. RESULTS: Among 605 patients (96.9% non-severe COVID-19; 325 normoglycaemia, 185 prediabetes, 95 diabetes), 74 (12.2%) had clinical deterioration, more likely with worse glycaemic status and higher HbA1c (p < 0.001). Older age (p < 0.001), higher viral loads (p < 0.001), higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.001) and symptomatic presentation (p = 0.008), but not glycaemic status/HbA1c, independently predicted clinical deterioration. Older age (p = 0.001), higher CRP (p = 0.038), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.046) and interferon treatment (p = 0.001), but not glycaemic status/HbA1c, independently predicted Nab titres. Rate of Nab titre decline was comparable across glycaemic status. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 patients with worse glycaemic status were more likely to deteriorate clinically, mediated through the association of worse glycaemic status with older age, more severe inflammation and higher viral loads. Importantly, Nab responses did not differ across glycaemic status.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases: Vaccination rates, patient perspectives, and side effects.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the vaccination rate, reported side effects, and patient concerns for COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: A multicentre cross-sectional study from rheumatology clinics in two major hospitals in Hong Kong was conducted between June 3, 2021 and October 8, 2021. Patient interviews for demographics, clinical characteristics, vaccination status, reported side effects, and factors influencing decisions about vaccination were supplemented with structured questionnaires. RESULTS: Out of 1367 patients, 413 (30.2%) had received COVID-19 vaccination. Side effects were reported in 335 (81.1%) of patients, of which the most common were injection site pain or swelling (66.3%), fatigue (57.1%), fever (19.9%), and headache (19.6%). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that males (odds ratio [OR] = 1.80; p < .001), higher education level (OR = 1.64; p < .001) and healthcare professionals (OR = 4.5; p < .001) were significantly more likely to have received the vaccine. In contrast, patients with hypertension (OR = 0.73; p = .04), systemic lupus erythematous (OR = 0.53; p < .001), stroke (OR = 0.29; p = .01), steroid therapy (OR = 0.59; p = .01), and leflunomide therapy (OR = 0.45; p = .05) were significantly less likely to be vaccinated. Younger age (age, OR = 0.96; p = .003) and messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines (OR = 4.79; p < .001) were associated with more side effects. There was no difference in risk of side effects between specific rheumatic diseases or drug therapies. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination is associated with no increased risk of side effects in any particular disease or drug therapy, therefore vaccination should be encouraged in patients with rheumatic disease. In addition, younger age is associated minimally, while mRNA vaccine is associated with increased side effects.